Intent-Bound
Execution

A change ships only if every check passes. A single failure means it’s refused. No exceptions, no overrides. The same change always gets the same answer. Flip the eight checks below and watch the verdict change in real time.

One path, no shortcuts. Every proposed change runs the same ten steps, from the original request to a signed verdict, and each step leaves tamper-proof evidence behind. Only after all of it does IBE decide.

Three real AI proposals: a broken rate limiter, code that quietly edits the wrong file, and infrastructure that would expose sensitive data. IBE caught and refused all three, each with a signed receipt you can re-verify. Open any one to see exactly why.

The same kernel answers a second question. Not has this change earned the right to execute, but has this decision earned the right to be signed. An engineering trade study or an acquisition decision becomes structured data: objectives, options, criteria, constraints, assumptions, risks and bias checks, each one explicit and testable. Eight checks then decide whether it can be signed. The answer is a signed Decision Package, or a signed refusal naming exactly what is missing.

A ground-vehicle platform choice, run on notional data and carried through a change in its assumptions. Every figure below comes from an actual run.

Episode 2 is the one that matters. A decision held in a document has no way to notice that its premise has expired, so the old recommendation goes on looking signed. Here the decision is part of the engineering model itself. Change anything it rests on and the signature stops verifying.

The verdict isn’t a judgment call. It’s math. The rules that grant permission and allow promotion are written as formal specifications and machine-checked, so we can prove the unsafe shortcuts simply can’t happen.

A working, coherent, production-oriented platform, not a finished product. It is deliberately explicit about what is real versus planned, and makes no false security or certification claims.